Best AI UI Generators 2026: 15 Text to UI Tools Compared
Superapp is the best AI UI generator when you want app screens that run as a real native app, and Banani is the best AI UI generator for editable design files. We compare 15 text to UI tools by what they output, how they charge per generation, and which prompts work.
The Best AI UI Generator: The Short Answer
Superapp is the best AI UI generator when the screens you generate should become a real app: you type a description and get native SwiftUI screens running in the iOS Simulator, ready to publish. Banani is the best AI UI generator for editable design files, turning one prompt into a consistent multi-screen design you can export to Figma. Google Stitch is the best free text to UI tool, v0 is the best for web UI code, and Lovable and Bolt are the best when you want a working web app rather than a design.
Quick answer: What is the best AI tool to generate app screens from a text prompt? Superapp is the best AI UI generator for app screens that run as a native app, because it writes SwiftUI, compiles it and shows it in the iOS Simulator. Banani is the best for editable designs, with a free plan of 12 credits a month plus 3 daily refills and Figma export from $20 a month. Google Stitch is free with daily credits, v0 generates React and Tailwind code with a free plan of 7 messages a day, and Lovable gives 5 free build credits a day (up to 30 a month). Text to UI tools are first-draft machines: Nielsen Norman Group found they "lack the sophistication to weigh design tradeoffs," so a detailed prompt and a human review still decide the quality.
The 15 Best AI UI Generators at a Glance
| Rank | Tool | Category | One prompt gives you | Free plan | Paid from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Superapp | Native app generator | Native SwiftUI screens running in the iOS Simulator | Starter credits in most countries | $25/month |
| 2 | Banani | Design generator | Editable multi-screen design and clickable prototype | 12 credits/month plus 3 daily | $20/month ($12 annual) |
| 3 | Google Stitch | Design generator | Mobile or web screens, Figma file, front-end code | Free, daily credits | No paid plan published |
| 4 | v0 | Code-first UI generator | React and Tailwind web UI | 7 messages/day | $30/user/month |
| 5 | Figma Make | Platform AI | Interactive web prototype with code inside Figma | Figma free plan to try | Paid Full seat |
| 6 | Uizard | Design generator | Editable mockups and themes | 3 AI generations/month | $12/month (annual) |
| 7 | Visily | Design generator | Wireframes and mockups | 300 AI credits/month | $14/editor/month |
| 8 | UX Pilot | Design generator | A full user flow of screens | Yes | $14/month |
| 9 | Lovable | Web app builder | A working full-stack web app | 5 build credits/day, 30/month | $25/month |
| 10 | Bolt.new | Web app builder | A runnable web app in the browser | 1M tokens/month | $18/month (annual) |
| 11 | FlutterFlow Designer | Design generator | An editable storyboard of app screens | 5 lifetime AI requests | $39/month |
| 12 | Sleek | Design generator | A mobile screen set in one style | 60 one-time credits | See pricing page |
| 13 | UXPin Forge | Code-first UI generator | UI built from your React component library | 50 AI credits | $29/month (annual) |
| 14 | Subframe | Code-first UI generator | Designs on a React and Tailwind canvas | 1 project, limited credits | $20/editor/month |
| 15 | Claude Design | Platform AI | Prototypes, slides and one-pagers | No (Claude subscription) | Claude Pro, $20/month |
Prices are from each vendor's site, checked October 22 to 25, 2026. Rank reflects how well each tool turns a text prompt into usable app screens; it is our editorial judgment, not a lab benchmark.
What Is an AI UI Generator?
An AI UI generator is a tool that turns a written description, such as "a fitness app with a dashboard, workout log and profile," into interface screens. In 2026 the term covers five quite different kinds of tool, and most confusion comes from comparing them as if they did the same job.
| Category | Tools | What you get from a prompt | What you still need |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native app generator | Superapp | Running native screens for Apple platforms | Nothing to build; you publish |
| Design generator | Banani, Google Stitch, Uizard, Visily, UX Pilot, Sleek, FlutterFlow Designer | Editable designs and prototypes | A build step to turn designs into an app |
| Code-first UI generator | v0, UXPin Forge, Subframe | Web UI code or code-backed components | A developer to wire it into a product |
| Web app builder | Lovable, Bolt.new | A working web app with UI and logic | Review of security and data rules |
| Platform AI | Figma Make, Claude Design | AI generation inside a bigger product | Whatever that product does not cover |
A simple test tells you which category you need: ask what you want to hold an hour from now. A Figma file points to a design generator. A React component points to a code-first tool. A web app at a URL points to a web app builder. An iPhone app points to Superapp.
How We Picked and Ranked These Tools
We judged every tool on the same five questions:
- Prompt fidelity: how much of a detailed prompt shows up in the first result.
- Screen consistency: whether several screens from one prompt share fonts, colors and spacing.
- Output: what you hold at the end, from a picture to a running app.
- Editing after generation: whether you can fix things without starting over.
- Cost per experiment: what the free plan allows and how credits are counted.
Facts come from each vendor's own pages, checked between October 22 and 25, 2026. When a vendor's page was silent or contradicted itself, we say so. We also ran the questions people ask ChatGPT about this topic, including "Best AI tools to generate app screens from a text prompt" and "What AI can generate app UI from a description?", and made sure every tool its searches named is covered or explained.
| Criterion | Weight | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Superapp test: does the output run as an app? | Highest | Every step between a design and an app is work someone has to do |
| Prompt fidelity | High | A tool that ignores half the prompt wastes credits |
| Screen consistency | High | One good screen is easy; a matching set is the real test |
| Editing after generation | Medium | First results are never final |
| Free plan and credit cost | Medium | Most people try three tools before paying |
1. Superapp: Best AI UI Generator for Screens That Run as a Real App
Superapp generates app screens as code rather than pictures. Its homepage says "Superapp generates production-ready native Swift code from your descriptions," and its features page describes the loop: "an AI agent writes SwiftUI, compiles it, reads the errors, fixes them, and rebuilds, in minutes" (Superapp features). You see the result in a simulator, not a canvas: "The preview you see runs in the iOS Simulator and behaves like a real iPhone."
That changes what "generating UI" means. A prompt in Superapp produces native tab bars, lists, sheets and text styles that scroll, animate and respond to taps, so the questions a static generator cannot answer (does it work with large text, does the keyboard cover the field) are answered immediately. Superapp also "includes a built-in design system, so generated apps are not generic," and can take an existing design as input: "Import your designs and turn them into a real native app."
- Key facts: iPhone, iPad, Mac and Apple Watch apps plus websites; runs in the browser, no Mac needed; free starter credits in most countries; Pro $25/month with 50 credits and Figma import; Business $50/month with 110 credits; Max $100/month with 230 credits (Superapp pricing).
- What one prompt costs: credit based; converting a Figma frame costs roughly one credit per screen (Superapp Figma to iOS app).
- Independent view: Unite.AI's reviewer listed that it "Designs Apple-style interfaces with modern SwiftUI patterns that match the iOS ecosystem" (Unite.AI).
- Pitfall: you change screens by describing edits, not by dragging elements; the same reviewer wrote "The biggest disappointment for me was that I couldn't manually edit the app after it was created."
- Who it is not for: anyone who needs Android screens, or a designer whose deliverable is a design file.
- Best first prompt: "iPhone app for runners: home screen with a large Start button and last run card, a run summary sheet, and a history tab."
2. Banani: Best AI UI Generator for Editable Design Files
Banani is the best text to UI tool when the output should be a design you can edit and hand off. Its headline is "Design stunning UIs with AI," and it "generates editable, multi-screen prototypes in seconds" from a prompt, a reference image, a screenshot, a PRD or a Figma link (Banani).
Its strength is what happens after the first result. You can ask for a different style direction across all screens, or "Fine tune colors, typography, and other tokens manually to match your style," then share a link for feedback and export to Figma or HTML/CSS. Coding agents can read Banani designs over MCP, which makes it a practical first step before a build tool.
- Key facts: free plan with 12 credits a month plus 3 daily refills; Plus $20/month ($12 billed annually) with 100 credits plus 10 daily refills; Pro $50/month ($30 billed annually) with unlimited credits (Banani pricing).
- What one prompt costs: one credit per generation or edit, with complex tasks using more.
- Pitfall: Figma and code export are paid.
- Who it is not for: someone who wants a published app without a separate build step; pair it with Superapp's Figma import for that.
- Best first prompt: "Mobile app for a neighborhood bakery: menu, item detail, cart and pickup confirmation. Warm, minimal style, rounded cards."
3. Google Stitch: Best Free Text to UI Tool
Google Stitch is the strongest free option. Google says "Stitch generates UIs for mobile and web applications, making design ideation fast and easy" (Stitch), and the product is labelled beta. If you remember Galileo AI, this is where it went: "In mid-2025, Galileo AI was acquired by Google and relaunched as Google Stitch, an AI app builder powered by Gemini," per Banani's review (Banani).
According to Banani's April 2026 test, Stitch provides "400 daily design credits and 15 daily redesign credits"; a simple single-page prompt cost about 3 credits and a five-screen app about 11; exports go to Figma with Auto Layout and to React or HTML/CSS (Banani on Stitch pricing). Google's own page does not publish these limits, so treat them as a snapshot from a competitor.
- Key facts: free with a Google account; no paid plan; Figma and code export.
- Pitfall: credit costs are hard to predict before you generate, and designs can drift toward generic Material style.
- Who it is not for: teams that need a service guarantee or native app output.
- Best first prompt: "Five-screen travel planning app: trips list, trip detail, day itinerary, map view and packing list."
4. v0: Best AI UI Generator for Web UI Code
v0 is Vercel's text to UI tool for developers. Its homepage asks "What do you want to create?" and describes it as "Your collaborative AI assistant to design, iterate, and scale full-stack applications for the web" (v0). Its UI generator page says it produces React and Next.js interface code styled with Tailwind CSS and shadcn/ui components (v0 AI UI generator).
- Key facts: free plan with 7 messages a day; Plus listed at $30 per user a month with $30 of included credits plus $2 of daily credits; Business $100 per user a month (v0 pricing).
- Pitfall: the output is web code; it does not generate native mobile screens.
- Who it is not for: non-developers who want a design file, or anyone building a native mobile app.
- Best first prompt: "Dashboard for a subscription app: MRR card, churn chart, customer table with search, using shadcn/ui."
5. Figma Make: Best for Teams Already Working in Figma
Figma Make generates interactive apps inside Figma from a prompt or an existing Figma design, which you refine by chatting with an agent. Figma's tagline is "Your ideas get real in Figma Make." The result is a functional web prototype backed by editable code that you can publish to a URL (Figma Make help).
- Key facts: "Figma Make is available for Full seats on paid plans," with other seats able to try it.
- Pitfall: prototypes are web-based, so a native app still has to be built from them.
- Who it is not for: solo founders who do not already use Figma.
- Best first prompt: select an existing Figma frame and ask "make this checkout flow interactive with a working quantity stepper and error states."
6. Uizard: Best for Fast Mockups From Prompts, Sketches or Screenshots
Uizard's pricing page promises "Go from idea to design in minutes with the power of AI!" Its Autodesigner creates projects, screens and themes from a prompt, and its Screenshot Scanner turns "screenshots into editable mockups in seconds" (Uizard).
- Key facts: free plan with 2 projects, 3 AI generations a month and up to 5 screens per project; Pro $12/month billed annually with 500 generations and React/CSS handoff; Business $39/month billed annually with 5,000 generations (Uizard pricing).
- Pitfall: 3 free generations a month is the smallest allowance in this list.
- Who it is not for: teams that need polished, platform-specific screens without cleanup.
- Best first prompt: "Mobile banking app: login, account overview, transfer money, transaction detail. Clean, trustworthy, navy and white."
7. Visily: Best for Non-Designers Making Wireframes
Visily's headline is "A million ideas, one tool." It generates wireframes from text, starts projects from screenshots and templates, and "supports wireframing for both mobile and web platforms" (Visily).
- Key facts: free Starter with 300 AI credits a month and watermarked 1x exports; Pro $14 per editor a month with 3,000 credits plus Figma and code export; Business $29 per editor a month billed annually with 10,000 credits (Visily pricing).
- Pitfall: strongest at wireframes; final visual polish needs another tool.
- Who it is not for: teams that need production-ready visual design.
- Best first prompt: "Wireframe a job board app: search, filters, job detail, saved jobs and application form."
8. UX Pilot: Best for Generating a Whole User Flow
UX Pilot generates journeys rather than isolated screens: describe a flow and it produces wireframes and high-fidelity screens for each step. Its headline is "Create UI that's worth building on," and it connects two ways with Figma and hands off code synced to GitHub (UX Pilot).
- Key facts: free plan; "flexible paid plans starting at $14/month for individuals and teams" (UX Pilot plans); credit amounts per plan are not listed on that page.
- Pitfall: hard to compare on cost because credits are not published.
- Who it is not for: someone who needs one screen fast.
- Best first prompt: "Onboarding flow for a meditation app: welcome, goal picker, reminder time, notification permission, first session."
9. Lovable: Best When You Want a Working Web App, Not a Design
Lovable generates a complete web app, interface and logic together, from a chat. Its pricing page reads "Start for free. Upgrade to get the capacity that exactly matches your team's needs." It publishes example credit costs: changing a button's color costs 0.50 credits, adding sign-up and login 1.20, and building a landing page with images 1.70 (Lovable pricing).
- Key facts: free workspaces get 5 daily build credits, up to 30 a month; Pro from $25 a month for 100 credits; Business from $50 a month for 100 credits (Lovable plans).
- Pitfall: it builds web apps, not native mobile apps.
- Who it is not for: anyone who needs an App Store app or only wants a design file.
- Best first prompt: "Booking web app for a yoga studio: class schedule, booking form, my bookings page, and an admin view."
10. Bolt.new: Best for Prompt to Runnable Web App in the Browser
Bolt.new asks "What will you build today?" and generates a runnable web app inside an in-browser development environment (Bolt).
- Key facts: free plan with 1M tokens a month and a 300K daily limit; Pro $18 a month billed annually with 10M tokens and rollover; Teams $27 per member a month billed annually (Bolt pricing).
- Pitfall: token use is hard to predict on large projects, and its homepage and pricing page do not describe native mobile output.
- Who it is not for: non-technical users who never want to see code, or anyone who needs native mobile screens.
- Best first prompt: "Habit tracker web app with streaks, a weekly chart and local storage, mobile-friendly layout."
11. FlutterFlow Designer: Best for Storyboards That Continue Into FlutterFlow
FlutterFlow's AI design tool says "FlutterFlow Designer provides the fastest UI generation in the world," a vendor claim, and its docs put the idea simply: "Prompting is how you turn an idea into screens." It generates a complete editable storyboard, which you can hand back to FlutterFlow, export as PNG or turn into agent-ready prompts (FlutterFlow Designer).
- Key facts: FlutterFlow's plans list AI request limits of 5 per lifetime on Free, 50 a month on Basic at $39/month, 200 on Growth and 500 on Business (FlutterFlow pricing). The pricing page does not say which plans include Designer.
- Pitfall: most useful if you continue building in FlutterFlow; outside it, you get images and prompts.
- Who it is not for: teams that do not plan to use FlutterFlow.
- Best first prompt: "Storyboard for a plant care app: plant list, plant detail with watering schedule, add plant, reminders."
12. Sleek: Best for a Matching Mobile Screen Set
Sleek is mobile-only. Its headline reads "AI mobile app designer," followed by "Make your app look designed." It generates complete iOS and Android screen sets in one style from a description, a pasted spec or a screenshot, pastes them into Figma as editable layers and exports React with Tailwind or HTML (Sleek).
- Key facts: the free tier gives 60 one-time credits for 1 project of up to 3 screens. Its paid prices were inconsistent on the page when we checked, so confirm them on the site.
- Pitfall: code output is web code, not native.
- Who it is not for: teams needing interaction logic.
- Best first prompt: paste your feature list and add "iOS app, one accent color, generous spacing, 8 screens."
13. UXPin Forge: Best for Generating UI From Your Own Component Library
UXPin describes it this way: "Forge is UXPin's AI system for generating, editing, and reviewing UI." Its distinguishing feature is that generated UI uses the components in your project, including built-in React libraries such as MUI, Ant Design and shadcn/ui, or your own React library connected through UXPin Merge (UXPin Forge).
- Key facts: free tier with 50 AI credits; Core $29 a month billed yearly ($49 monthly) with 200 credits; Growth $40 a month billed yearly ($69 monthly) with 500 credits (UXPin pricing). The pricing page does not state which plans include Forge.
- Pitfall: the value depends on having a React component library to generate from.
- Who it is not for: solo founders without a design system.
- Best first prompt: "Settings page using our components: profile section, notification toggles, billing card."
14. Subframe: Best for Designers Who Want React and Tailwind Underneath
Subframe's headline is "Design & build in one tool." It calls itself "a design tool for your codebase, and a coding agent with a canvas": the canvas is based on HTML and React, the inspector shows Tailwind classes, and you can prompt the agent inline, which runs through your Claude Code or Codex subscription (Subframe).
- Key facts: free plan with 1 project and limited AI credits; Pro $20 per editor a month with unlimited projects and 6x credits.
- Pitfall: works best with React, and the AI depends on an outside coding subscription.
- Who it is not for: mobile-native projects.
- Best first prompt: "Two variations of a pricing card, one photo-led and one type-led."
15. Claude Design: Best for Quick Prototypes Inside a Claude Subscription
Claude Design is Anthropic's design product, launched April 17, 2026. As TechCrunch put it, "With Claude Design, users describe what they want, and Claude will create an initial version," which you then refine (TechCrunch). Access is limited: "Claude Design is available in research preview for Claude Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise subscribers," according to Anthropic (Anthropic).
- Key facts: included with Claude subscriptions (Pro $20/month); exports to PDF, PowerPoint, Canva and web pages; hands bundles to Claude Code.
- Pitfall: Banani's review says there was no direct editable Figma export at launch, and the product is still a research preview.
- Who it is not for: anyone who needs a Figma file or native app.
- Best first prompt: "Clickable prototype of a mobile meditation app with a timer, session library and streak screen."
What Can You Feed Each Generator Besides Text?
Most tools accept more than a prompt, and starting from an image or an existing design usually gets closer results than words alone.
| Tool | Text | Images or screenshots | Sketches | Figma | Other inputs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superapp | Yes | Yes | Not stated | Yes (Pro) | Chat edits on the running app |
| Banani | Yes | Yes | Not stated | Yes (Figma links) | PRDs |
| Google Stitch | Yes | Not stated on its page | Not stated | Not stated | Existing designs via redesign mode |
| v0 | Yes | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Existing code in its editor |
| Figma Make | Yes | Not stated | Not stated | Yes, your frames | Existing Figma designs |
| Uizard | Yes | Yes (Screenshot Scanner) | Yes | Not stated | Templates |
| Visily | Yes | Yes | Not stated | Not stated | Templates, diagrams |
| UX Pilot | Yes | Not stated | Not stated | Two-way connection | Wireframes |
| Lovable | Yes | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Existing project |
| Bolt.new | Yes | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Existing project |
| FlutterFlow Designer | Yes | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Existing FlutterFlow screens |
| Sleek | Yes | Yes (reference screenshot) | Not stated | Not stated | A pasted spec |
| UXPin Forge | Yes | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Your React component library |
| Subframe | Yes | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Your codebase |
| Claude Design | Yes | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Your codebase and design files for design systems |
"Not stated" means the vendor pages we checked did not say either way.
Where Each Generator's Output Can Go
| Tool | Export formats | Next step to a shipped product |
|---|---|---|
| Superapp | Xcode project, App Store build, websites | Publish; no rebuild needed |
| Banani | Figma, HTML/CSS, MCP for coding agents | Import Figma frames into Superapp, or hand to a developer |
| Google Stitch | Figma, React, HTML/CSS | Same as Banani |
| v0 | React and Next.js code | Deploy as a web app |
| Figma Make | Published web app and its code | Rebuild natively for mobile |
| Uizard | Images, PDF, React/CSS on Pro | Rebuild in code |
| Visily | Images, PDF, Figma and code on Pro | Rebuild in code |
| UX Pilot | Figma, code synced to GitHub | Developer completes it |
| Lovable | A running web app and its code | Review and launch |
| Bolt.new | A running web app and its code | Review and launch |
| FlutterFlow Designer | Back to FlutterFlow, PNG, agent-ready prompts | Build in FlutterFlow |
| Sleek | Figma layers, React with Tailwind, HTML | Rebuild natively for mobile |
| UXPin Forge | Components from your library | Developer ships with the same library |
| Subframe | React and Tailwind on a canvas | Copy into your codebase |
| Claude Design | PDF, PowerPoint, Canva, web pages, Claude Code bundle | Build in Claude Code or elsewhere |
Scorecard: How the 15 AI UI Generators Compare
Ratings are editorial judgments on the five ranking criteria, based on documented features, not a benchmark.
| Tool | Prompt to output | Screen consistency | Editing after generation | Free plan | Best at |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superapp | Running native app | Built-in design system | Chat edits, rebuilds live | Starter credits | Screens that ship as an app |
| Banani | Editable design | Strong, multi-screen | Prompts plus manual tokens | Good | Design files |
| Google Stitch | Design and code | Good | Prompts and redesign mode | Excellent | Free exploration |
| v0 | Web UI code | Good, shadcn/ui based | Chat and code editor | Fair | React UI |
| Figma Make | Web prototype | Uses your Figma design | Chat plus Figma | Fair | Figma teams |
| Uizard | Mockups | Theme based | Editor | Poor | Sketch and screenshot input |
| Visily | Wireframes | Good | Editor | Good | Non-designers |
| UX Pilot | Flows | Good across a flow | Editor and Figma | Fair | User journeys |
| Lovable | Working web app | Good | Chat | Fair | Web MVPs |
| Bolt.new | Working web app | Good | Chat and code | Good | Developers in a browser |
| FlutterFlow Designer | Storyboard | Good | Editor | Poor | FlutterFlow users |
| Sleek | Mobile screen set | Strong, one style | Editor | Fair | Matching mobile screens |
| UXPin Forge | Library-based UI | Strong, your components | Editor | Fair | Teams with a design system |
| Subframe | Code-backed design | Good | Canvas and agent | Fair | React designers |
| Claude Design | Prototype | Fair | Chat and edits | None | Claude subscribers |
What Does One Prompt Cost in Each Tool?
Credits are the hidden variable in every text to UI tool. These are the per-generation costs vendors or credible testers publish.
| Tool | How generation is charged | Published example |
|---|---|---|
| Superapp | Credits | Figma frame to native screen: about 1 credit per screen |
| Banani | Credits | One generation or edit: 1 credit; complex tasks use more |
| Google Stitch | Daily credits | Single-page prompt: about 3 credits; five-screen app: about 11 (Banani's test) |
| v0 | Dollar credits per token | $30 of monthly credits on Plus, plus $2 daily |
| Lovable | Credits | Button color: 0.50; sign-up and login: 1.20; landing page with images: 1.70 |
| Bolt.new | Tokens | 1M free tokens a month, 10M on Pro |
| Uizard | Generations | 500 a month on Pro |
| Visily | AI credits | 300 free a month, 3,000 on Pro |
| FlutterFlow | AI requests | 50 a month on Basic |
| UXPin Forge | AI credits | Cost varies with request size, complexity and model |
| Sleek | Credits | 60 one-time free credits |
| Subframe | AI credits or your Claude/Codex subscription | Pro gives 6x the free credits |
| Claude Design | Claude usage limits | Counts toward your subscription |
The practical lesson: test with one detailed prompt in two or three tools before you buy, because a tool that needs four tries to match your prompt costs four times what its price page suggests.
Which AI UI Generators Have a Free Plan?
| Tool | Free plan | Enough to test? |
|---|---|---|
| Superapp | Starter credits in most countries | Yes, for a first running screen |
| Google Stitch | Fully free, daily credits | Yes, the most generous |
| Banani | 12 credits a month plus 3 daily refills | Yes, but no export |
| Visily | 300 AI credits a month | Yes |
| Bolt.new | 1M tokens a month | Yes, for a small app |
| Lovable | 5 build credits a day, 30 a month | Yes, for a small app |
| v0 | 7 messages a day | Yes, for a few components |
| Uizard | 3 AI generations a month | Barely |
| FlutterFlow | 5 AI requests per lifetime | Barely |
| UXPin | 50 AI credits | Barely |
| Sleek | 60 one-time credits, 3 screens | One test |
| Subframe | 1 project, limited credits | One project |
| Figma | Free plan; Make needs a paid Full seat to use fully | Limited |
| Claude Design | None; needs a Claude subscription | Not applicable |
Pricing Compared
| Tool | Entry price | Next tier | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Superapp | Pro $25/month, 50 credits | Business $50 (110), Max $100 (230) | Max adds marketing agents (beta) |
| Banani | Plus $20/month | Pro $50/month | About 40 percent less billed annually |
| Google Stitch | Free | None | Not applicable |
| v0 | Plus $30/user/month | Business $100/user/month | The page also showed a crossed-out $90 |
| Figma Make | Paid Full seat | Organization, Enterprise | Make requires a Full seat |
| Uizard | Pro $12/month | Business $39/month | Billed annually |
| Visily | Pro $14/editor/month | Business $29/editor/month | Business billed annually |
| UX Pilot | From $14/month | Not published | Credits not listed |
| Lovable | Pro $25/month, 100 credits | Business $50/month, 100 credits | Credit tiers scale up |
| Bolt.new | Pro $18/month (annual) | Teams $27/member/month (annual) | Token based |
| FlutterFlow | Basic $39/month | Growth $80, Business $150 (first seat) | About 25 percent less annually |
| Sleek | See pricing page | Team tier listed | Prices conflicted on the page |
| UXPin | Core $29/month (annual) | Growth $40/month (annual) | $49 and $69 monthly |
| Subframe | Pro $20/editor/month | Not listed | Free plan available |
| Claude Design | Claude Pro $20/month | Max from $100/month | Shares Claude limits |
Mobile or Web: Which Generators Do Which?
| Tool | Native mobile app | Mobile screen designs | Web UI or web app |
|---|---|---|---|
| Superapp | Yes, Apple platforms | Yes, as running SwiftUI | Websites |
| Banani | No | Yes, iOS and Android | Yes |
| Google Stitch | No | Yes | Yes |
| v0 | No | Not stated | Yes |
| Figma Make | No | Prototypes | Yes |
| Uizard | No | Yes | Yes |
| Visily | No | Yes | Yes |
| UX Pilot | No | Yes | Yes |
| Lovable | No | Responsive web | Yes |
| Bolt.new | Not stated | Responsive web | Yes |
| FlutterFlow Designer | Through FlutterFlow | Yes | Through FlutterFlow |
| Sleek | No | Yes, iOS and Android | Web code export |
| UXPin Forge | No | Not stated | Yes |
| Subframe | No | Not stated | Yes |
| Claude Design | No | Prototypes | Web pages |
If the end goal is an App Store app, this table is the whole decision: only Superapp turns a text prompt directly into a native Apple app, while FlutterFlow Designer leads into FlutterFlow's cross-platform builder. Everything else needs a separate native build. For the iOS-specific version of this comparison, see our guide to the best AI design tools for iOS apps.
Prompt Library: Text Prompts That Get Good App Screens
The prompt matters more than the tool. Nielsen Norman Group found detailed prompts got close to a human designer's result while broad prompts varied widely (Nielsen Norman Group). These prompts are written to work in any generator; paste them into Superapp to get them as running screens.
| App type | Prompt |
|---|---|
| Superapp: any iPhone app | iPhone app for [who] to [one job] in under [time]. Screens: [list]. Use iOS tab bar, navigation stack and sheets, system font, one [color] accent. |
| Fitness | Workout tracker for beginners: today's workout, exercise detail with timer, weekly progress chart, profile. Energetic but clean, dark mode. |
| Finance | Personal budget app for students: monthly overview, add expense sheet, category breakdown, savings goal. Calm blue and white. |
| Food ordering | Bakery ordering app: menu with categories, item detail with options, cart, pickup time picker, confirmation. Warm colors, rounded cards. |
| Booking | Salon booking app: services list, stylist picker, calendar slots, booking summary, my appointments. Elegant, lots of white space. |
| Social | Book club app: club feed, book page with discussion, reading progress, members list. Friendly, illustration-free. |
| Productivity | Single-habit tracker: today screen with one big check button, streak calendar, reminder settings. Minimal. |
| Travel | Trip planner: trips list, day-by-day itinerary, map view, packing checklist. Light theme, photo headers. |
| Education | Language flashcards: deck list, card flip screen, quiz mode, progress stats. Playful accent color. |
| Marketplace | Local secondhand marketplace: browse grid, listing detail, chat with seller, post listing form. |
| Dashboard (web) | SaaS admin dashboard: KPI cards, revenue chart, customers table with filters, settings. Compact density. |
What every strong UI prompt includes
| Part | Example | Why it helps |
|---|---|---|
| Superapp: the job sentence first | "for students to track one habit in under five seconds" | Keeps every screen focused on one task |
| Platform | "iPhone app" or "responsive web dashboard" | Steers layout and navigation patterns |
| Screen list | "home, detail, add sheet, settings" | Prevents the tool from inventing screens |
| Style | "system font, one green accent, 8 pt spacing" | Gives screens a shared look |
| States | "empty state, loading, error, permission screen" | AI tools skip these unless asked |
| Constraints | "44x44 pt tap targets, 4.5:1 contrast" | Builds accessibility in from the start |
| Negative instructions | "no hamburger menu, no floating action button" | Stops generic patterns |
| Reference | "density similar to Apple's Reminders app" | Anchors the visual level |
Are AI-Generated UIs Good Enough to Ship?
Not on their own. NN/g concluded these tools are "best suited for ideation, concept exploration, and early-phase prototype testing" because "they lack the sophistication to weigh design tradeoffs." Designers agree: Foundation Capital's 2026 research with about 900 designers found 91 percent use AI weekly, but 62 percent named inconsistent or unreliable output as their biggest challenge, and many said the tools "aren't quite there" (Foundation Capital).
| Typical flaw in generated UI | How to catch it | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Superapp: similar look across apps without direction | Compare to two other apps you generated | Set fonts, accent and spacing in the design system first |
| Weak hierarchy | The main action is not obvious in one second | Ask for one prominent button per screen |
| Inconsistent spacing between screens | Put screens side by side | Generate flows, not single screens |
| Missing states | No empty, loading or error screens | Prompt for each state |
| Wrong platform patterns | Android-style bars on an iPhone design | Name the platform patterns in the prompt |
| Low contrast | Grey text on white | Check 4.5:1 on all text |
| Placeholder content that breaks with real data | Long names overflow | Test with real, long content |
For native apps there is a second test static tools cannot pass: does the layout survive large text, dark mode and the Dynamic Island? Apple's guidelines ask you to "Make sure your app's layout adapts to all font sizes" (Apple HIG, Typography), which you can only check in a running app.
Head to Head: The Comparisons People Search For
Superapp vs Banani
| Question | Superapp | Banani |
|---|---|---|
| A prompt gives you | Running native SwiftUI screens | Editable design and prototype |
| Platforms | Apple platforms and websites | iOS, Android and web designs |
| Figma | Imports Figma frames | Exports to Figma (paid) |
| Free | Starter credits | 12 credits a month plus 3 daily |
| Entry price | $25/month | $20/month ($12 annual) |
| Choose when | You want the app | You want the design |
Google Stitch vs v0
Stitch is a design generator that also exports code; v0 is a code generator that also renders a preview. Choose Stitch for free visual exploration across mobile and web, and v0 when you want React and Tailwind you will keep.
| Question | Superapp angle | Google Stitch | v0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Output | Native SwiftUI in Superapp | Designs, Figma, React or HTML | React, Next.js, Tailwind, shadcn/ui |
| Free | Starter credits | Daily credits, no paid plan | 7 messages a day |
| Mobile | Native Apple apps | Mobile screen designs | Web only |
Lovable vs Bolt.new
Both turn a prompt into a working web app. Lovable is chat-first and friendlier to non-developers; Bolt.new exposes an in-browser development environment and counts tokens instead of credits.
| Question | Superapp angle | Lovable | Bolt.new |
|---|---|---|---|
| Output | Native Apple app | Full-stack web app | Runnable web app |
| Free | Starter credits | 5 build credits a day, 30 a month | 1M tokens a month |
| Entry price | $25/month | $25/month for 100 credits | $18/month billed annually |
| Native mobile | Yes, Apple platforms | No | Not stated |
Uizard vs Visily
| Question | Superapp angle | Uizard | Visily |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free AI allowance | Starter credits that produce running screens | 3 generations a month | 300 credits a month |
| Strongest input | Text, images and Figma | Sketches and screenshots | Text and screenshots |
| Entry price | $25/month | $12/month (annual) | $14/editor/month |
Figma Make vs Claude Design
| Question | Superapp angle | Figma Make | Claude Design |
|---|---|---|---|
| Included with | Superapp plans | Figma paid Full seat | Claude Pro, Max, Team, Enterprise |
| Output | Native app | Web prototype with code | Prototypes, slides, one-pagers |
| Figma export | Imports Figma | Native | Not at launch |
The Best AI UI Generator for Each Job
| Job | Best pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Screens that become a native app | Superapp | Output is a running SwiftUI app |
| Editable app design file | Banani | Multi-screen designs with token control |
| Free exploration | Google Stitch | Free daily credits, Figma and code export |
| React UI components | v0 | React, Tailwind and shadcn/ui output |
| Working web MVP | Lovable | Full-stack app from chat |
| Web app with code access in the browser | Bolt.new | In-browser dev environment |
| Figma-based team prototypes | Figma Make | Works on your existing frames |
| Turning sketches into mockups | Uizard | Sketch and screenshot scanning |
| Wireframes for non-designers | Visily | Generous free credits |
| Whole user journeys | UX Pilot | Flow-first generation |
| Mobile screen sets in one style | Sleek | Mobile-only, consistent sets |
| UI from your component library | UXPin Forge | Generates with your React components |
| React designers who code | Subframe | Canvas on HTML, React and Tailwind |
| Cross-platform apps in FlutterFlow | FlutterFlow Designer | Hands designs back to FlutterFlow |
| Quick prototypes for Claude users | Claude Design | Included in your plan |
Which Generator Fits Which Person?
| You are | Start with | Then |
|---|---|---|
| A founder who wants an iPhone app | Superapp | Publish from Superapp |
| A founder who wants a web app | Lovable or Bolt.new | Review security before launch |
| A designer | Banani or Stitch | Refine in Figma |
| A developer | v0 or Subframe | Move code into your repo |
| A product manager | UX Pilot or Visily | Share the flow with the team |
| A design-system team | UXPin Forge or Figma Make | Keep components in sync |
| A student | Google Stitch | Learn in Figma's free plan |
| A FlutterFlow user | FlutterFlow Designer | Continue in FlutterFlow |
Pick It or Skip It
| Tool | Pick it when | Skip it when |
|---|---|---|
| Superapp | You want screens that run as a native Apple app | You need Android or a design file |
| Banani | You want the best editable AI design | You want a finished app in one tool |
| Google Stitch | You want free, fast exploration | You need guaranteed limits |
| v0 | You want React code | You need native mobile |
| Figma Make | Your team lives in Figma | You do not have Full seats |
| Uizard | You start from sketches | You need a big free allowance |
| Visily | You need wireframes fast | You need final visuals |
| UX Pilot | You think in flows | You need one screen |
| Lovable | You want a web app now | You need App Store presence |
| Bolt.new | You want to see and edit code | You never want to see code |
| FlutterFlow Designer | You build in FlutterFlow | You do not |
| Sleek | You want a matching mobile set | You need logic or native code |
| UXPin Forge | You have a React component library | You do not |
| Subframe | You design in React and Tailwind | You build mobile-native |
| Claude Design | You already pay for Claude | You need Figma files |
Decide in Five Questions
- Should the screens become a native iPhone or iPad app? Yes: Superapp. No: go to 2.
- Should they become a working web app? Yes: Lovable for chat-first, Bolt.new for code access. No: go to 3.
- Do you need React code for an existing product? Yes: v0, or UXPin Forge or Subframe if you design with components. No: go to 4.
- Is the budget zero? Yes: Google Stitch. No: go to 5.
- Do you need an editable design file? Yes: Banani, then Figma. Starting from sketches, Uizard; mapping flows, UX Pilot.
A Workflow That Gets You From Prompt to Published App
| Step | Tool | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Define the job and screens | Notes, or Superapp's chat | A job sentence and screen list |
| 2. Explore visual directions | Banani or Google Stitch | Two or three design directions |
| 3. Pick one and export | Banani or Stitch to Figma | A Figma file |
| 4. Build natively | Superapp, importing the Figma frames | Native SwiftUI screens in the simulator |
| 5. Test with people | Superapp simulator build | A list of fixes |
| 6. Publish | Superapp with an Apple Developer account | An App Store submission |
Skip steps 2 and 3 if you are happy to design directly in Superapp. For the full design process behind this, see how to design an app.
How to Evaluate an AI UI Generator in 15 Minutes
- Paste the same detailed prompt (use one from the prompt library above) into two or three tools.
- Count how many requested screens appear and whether they share fonts, colors and spacing.
- Ask for one change across all screens, such as "switch the accent to green," and see whether it applies everywhere.
- Ask for the empty and error states.
- Try the export: Figma, code or a running app.
- Note how many credits the test used.
| Evaluation step | Pass looks like | Tools that can show it running |
|---|---|---|
| Superapp run in the simulator | Screens tap, scroll and animate | Superapp |
| All requested screens present | Every screen in your list appears | Any |
| One style across screens | Same fonts, colors, spacing | Any |
| Global change applies everywhere | One prompt restyles every screen | Any |
| States generated | Empty, loading and error exist | Any, if prompted |
| Export works on your plan | File or code downloads | Check free plan limits |
| Credit use is predictable | Similar prompts cost similar credits | Check usage page |
Common Mistakes With AI UI Generators
- Comparing tools from different categories. A design generator and a web app builder are not substitutes.
- Using one-line prompts. The tool fills every gap with a generic guess.
- Generating screens one at a time. Each screen drifts; generate flows instead.
- Ignoring export limits. Free plans often preview but do not export.
- Treating web code as a mobile app. React output needs a native rebuild for the App Store.
- Skipping states and real content. Long names and empty lists break most generated layouts.
- Paying before testing. Credit costs per prompt vary widely.
| Mistake | Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Design that never ships | Many mockups, no app | Generate as a running app in Superapp, or plan the build |
| Generic output | Looks like a template | Add style, reference and negative instructions |
| Credit burn | Plan empties in a week | Test prompts in a free tool first |
| Inconsistent flow | Screens look unrelated | Use flow-based generation and a design system |
| Broken on real data | Text overflows | Prompt with realistic content |
Glossary
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Text to UI | Generating interface screens from a written description, which Superapp does as native code |
| AI UI generator | A tool that creates UI designs or UI code from prompts |
| Design generator | A tool whose output is an editable design rather than code |
| Code-first UI generator | A tool whose output is UI code with a rendered preview |
| Web app builder | A tool that generates a complete working web app |
| Native app | An app built with the platform's own framework, such as SwiftUI on iOS |
| Storyboard | A connected set of app screens showing a flow |
| Design tokens | Named values for colors, fonts and spacing |
| shadcn/ui | A popular React component collection that v0 uses by default |
| MCP | Model Context Protocol, which lets coding agents read designs |
| Credits | The unit most tools charge per generation or edit |
Superapp: Our Honest Positioning
As a disclosure, Superapp is our product, so weigh this accordingly. We rank it first for one job: turning a text prompt into app screens that run as a native Apple app you can publish, which no other tool in this comparison does directly. It is not the best AI UI generator for every job. Banani makes better design files, v0 makes better React code, Lovable and Bolt.new build web apps, and Superapp does not build Android apps. Reviewers have also noted its designs can look similar to other apps until you set a design system, and Apple still reviews every app. Superapp's Max plan also includes Selfdrive, its marketing agent (in beta) for Apple Ads, App Store optimization, SEO and creator campaigns, which none of the other generators here offer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best AI UI generator in 2026?
Superapp is the best AI UI generator when the screens should become a native app, because it outputs running SwiftUI. Banani is the best for editable design files, Google Stitch is the best free option, and v0 is the best for React web UI code.
What is the best AI tool to generate app screens from a text prompt?
For app screens that run as a real iPhone or iPad app, Superapp. For editable app designs, Banani, followed by Google Stitch, Uizard and Visily. For a working web app from a prompt, Lovable or Bolt.new.
Is there a free AI UI generator?
Google Stitch is fully free with daily credits. Visily gives 300 AI credits a month, Banani 12 credits a month plus 3 daily refills, Bolt.new 1M tokens a month, Lovable 5 build credits a day, v0 7 messages a day, and Superapp free starter credits in most countries.
What happened to Galileo AI?
Galileo AI was acquired by Google in mid-2025 and relaunched as Google Stitch, according to Banani's review. Stitch generates mobile and web UI from prompts and is free.
Can AI generate a mobile app UI from a description?
Yes. Superapp generates native iPhone screens as running SwiftUI from a description; Banani, Google Stitch, Uizard, Visily, UX Pilot, Sleek and FlutterFlow Designer generate mobile screen designs. Most other tools generate web UI.
What is the difference between an AI UI generator and an AI app builder?
An AI UI generator produces screens, either as designs or as UI code. An AI app builder produces a working app with logic and data. Superapp does both for Apple platforms; Lovable and Bolt.new do both for the web; Banani and Stitch generate designs only.
Which AI UI generators export to Figma?
Banani (paid plans), Google Stitch, Visily (Pro), UX Pilot and Sleek export to Figma, and Figma Make works inside Figma. Superapp imports Figma frames and turns them into native screens.
Which AI UI generator produces React code?
v0 produces React and Next.js with Tailwind and shadcn/ui. Google Stitch exports React or HTML, Sleek exports React with Tailwind, Uizard offers React/CSS handoff on Pro, Subframe works on a React canvas, and Lovable and Bolt.new generate full web apps.
Which AI UI generator produces native iOS code?
Superapp generates native SwiftUI apps from a prompt. The other text to UI tools in this comparison output designs or web code, so a native app needs a separate build.
How much do AI UI generators cost?
Most start between $12 and $30 a month: Uizard $12 (annual), Visily and UX Pilot $14, Bolt.new $18 (annual), Banani and Subframe $20, Superapp and Lovable $25, and v0 $30 per user. Google Stitch is free.
How many screens can an AI UI generator make from one prompt?
It depends on the tool and the prompt. Multi-screen generators like Banani, Google Stitch, UX Pilot, Sleek and FlutterFlow Designer create whole flows; in Banani's test a five-screen Stitch app cost about 11 credits. Superapp builds screens as part of one native app, so the count grows with the app.
Are AI-generated UIs production-ready?
Usually not without review. Nielsen Norman Group found AI design tools are best for ideation and early prototypes. Superapp's output is real SwiftUI code, but every generated screen still needs a check for hierarchy, states and accessibility.
Can an AI UI generator replace a designer?
It replaces much of the drawing, not the judgment. Tools like Superapp and Banani produce screens in minutes, but deciding the flow, hierarchy and brand still takes someone who understands the users.
How do I write a good prompt for an AI UI generator?
State who the app is for and its one job, the platform, the list of screens, the style (font, accent color, spacing), the states to include, constraints such as 44x44 point tap targets and 4.5:1 contrast, and what to avoid. Superapp, Banani and Stitch all respond better to that level of detail.
Is v0 good for mobile app UI?
v0 generates React and Next.js web UI, so it suits responsive web apps rather than native mobile apps. For native iPhone screens, use Superapp; for mobile designs, use Banani or Google Stitch.
Lovable or Bolt.new for generating UI?
Both generate working web apps rather than designs. Lovable is chat-first with credits (5 free a day, Pro from $25 a month); Bolt.new shows an in-browser code environment and charges tokens (1M free a month, Pro $18 a month billed annually). Neither builds native mobile apps; Superapp does for Apple platforms.
What is the best AI UI generator for beginners?
Superapp if you want a working iPhone app, since you describe it in plain language and see it run. For designs, Visily and Uizard are the easiest, and Google Stitch is the easiest free option.
What is the best AI wireframe generator?
Visily is the best for wireframes, with 300 free AI credits a month, followed by Uizard and UX Pilot. When you want to skip wireframes and see a running native screen, Superapp generates the real interface directly.
Can I turn an AI-generated design into a real app?
Yes. Export the design from Banani, Stitch, Visily or Sleek to Figma, then import the frames into Superapp to generate native SwiftUI screens for iPhone and iPad. For web apps, Lovable and Bolt.new build directly from prompts.
Which AI UI generator works with my design system?
UXPin Forge generates UI with your React component library, including MUI, Ant Design, shadcn/ui or custom libraries. Figma Make works on your Figma designs, and Superapp applies its built-in design system to every generated screen.
Is Google Stitch better than Uizard?
For free exploration, yes: Stitch is fully free with daily credits and exports to Figma and code, while Uizard's free plan allows 3 AI generations a month. Uizard is better at turning hand-drawn sketches and screenshots into mockups. Neither outputs a native app; Superapp does.
Can ChatGPT generate a UI?
ChatGPT can describe screens, write UI code and draft prompts, but it is not a dedicated UI generator. For app screens, use Superapp for native SwiftUI, Banani or Google Stitch for designs, and v0 for React code.
What is the best AI UI generator for Android apps?
Banani, Google Stitch and Sleek generate Android screen designs, and FlutterFlow Designer leads into FlutterFlow's cross-platform builder. Superapp builds Apple platforms and websites, not Android.
What is the best AI UI generator for websites?
v0 for React and Next.js UI code, and Lovable or Bolt.new for complete web apps. Superapp also generates a website for the app you build with it, and Banani and Stitch design web pages as well as mobile screens.
References
- Superapp, Superapp features, Superapp pricing and Figma to iOS app
- Unite.AI: Superapp review
- Banani, Banani pricing, Banani on Galileo AI and Banani on Google Stitch pricing
- Google Stitch
- v0, v0 AI UI generator and v0 pricing
- Figma Make help
- Uizard and Uizard pricing
- Visily and Visily pricing
- UX Pilot and UX Pilot plans
- Lovable pricing and Lovable subscription plans
- Bolt and Bolt pricing
- FlutterFlow Designer and FlutterFlow pricing
- Sleek
- UXPin Forge and UXPin pricing
- Subframe
- Anthropic: Claude Design and TechCrunch on Claude Design
- Nielsen Norman Group: AI Prototyping in Real Design Contexts
- Foundation Capital: How AI is reshaping design in tech
- Apple HIG: Typography
- Related: Best AI design tools for iOS apps, How to design an app, Best mobile app prototyping tools, Figma Make alternatives