Grok Bot Review: vs Claude, Codex and Selfdrive (2026)

Grok Bot Review: The Short Answer

Grok Bot is xAI's product for "AI teammates": persistent AI agents that each get their own cloud computer, sign in to your apps and websites, and keep working on recurring jobs after you close your laptop. In hands-on tests, reviewers found it unusually easy to set up and genuinely useful for repetitive browser-based work, such as inbox triage and multi-account tasks, but it is an early beta with real security trade-offs: all of an account's Bots share one computer and its logins, approvals cannot undo work already done, and you cannot choose the underlying AI model. This review also compares Grok Bot with Claude and OpenAI Codex, and tests one argument with evidence: for a well-defined job like marketing an iPhone app, a specialized workflow with direct access to the right data, such as Superapp's Selfdrive agent, still outperforms a general-purpose agent operating websites the way a person would.

Quick answer: is Grok Bot worth it? Grok Bot is worth trying if you have recurring, browser-heavy work across many accounts, such as inbox triage, research, outreach, or social posting, and you are willing to start with narrow, read-only jobs and approve anything consequential. It launched in beta on August 11, 2026, and is now included in xAI and Cursor subscription plans rather than sold separately; plan listings have changed several times, so check the current page. Skip it, or wait, if you need deterministic automation, strict security separation between tasks, a full audit trail, or control over which AI model runs your work.

What Is Grok Bot?

Superapp builds apps, and Grok Bot does something different: it does the work you would otherwise do yourself across your tools. xAI introduced it on August 11, 2026, with one line: "Today we're launching Grok Bot, AI teammates you can give real work to." The company's description of how it works is equally short: "Bots have their own computer." They "finish jobs end to end, and only come back when something needs your approval," and "You can message them like a colleague and hand off the work" (xAI).

In practice, a Bot is a named AI agent with a specific job, such as "inbox assistant" or "weekly competitor report." It runs on a cloud computer with a browser, terminal, and file system, signs in to the services you allow, and keeps its memory between runs. You can give it a job once, or show it a workflow, and it repeats that work on a schedule.

Who Makes Grok Bot?

Superapp readers following the AI tools market have seen this part move quickly. Grok Bot comes from xAI, the company behind the Grok assistant. xAI merged with SpaceX in 2026, and SpaceX then agreed to acquire Anysphere, the company behind the Cursor code editor, for 60 billion USD, a deal TechZine reported was "scheduled to close in the third quarter of 2026" (TechZine). That is why Grok Bot is documented on Cursor's site, why "The computers Bots work on run in Cursor's cloud" (Cursor Docs), and why Grok and Cursor subscriptions now overlap.

How Grok Bot Works

Superapp users will recognize the idea of describing a job and letting an agent do it; Grok Bot applies it to everyday operations rather than app building. xAI's design notes explain the main building blocks (xAI: Designing Grok Bot).

xAI's product page adds that you "Log Grok Bot in once," that Bots keep running around the clock, that "Bots keep context and learn from each other," and that when you show a Bot a workflow, "It saves it as a routine and runs it on its own next time" (xAI: Grok Bot).

Platforms. xAI lists desktop apps for macOS, Windows, and Linux, an iOS app on the App Store, and Android as coming soon (xAI). A Google Play listing for Grok Bot also appeared in October 2026 search results.

Grok Bot Pricing and Plans

Superapp has one price list; Grok Bot's has changed several times since launch, so treat any number as a snapshot. Grok Bot is not sold as a standalone subscription. It comes with xAI and Cursor plans, and usage is drawn from a weekly allowance.

(Keywords Everywhere's sourced timeline)

In October 2026, Cursor's pricing page lists Plus at 8 USD a month, Premium at 30 USD (which includes "cloud agents, automations"), Super at 100 USD, Ultra at 200 USD, and Teams from 30 USD per user (Cursor). Keywords Everywhere reports that new sign-ups get Grok Bot through the Premium tier, though it notes it could not verify the date of that change.

Three things matter more than the headline price:

• Usage drains quickly. Flavio Copes, who tested it for weeks, notes that browsing, retries, multi-Bot discussion, and frequent routines all consume the allowance, and that "A routine running every 15 minutes runs 96 times a day" (Flavio Copes).
• The allowance is not published in numbers. Reviewer Ali Fakhri used about 34% of his weekly allowance in the first 12 days of a real workload, but xAI does not publish what the allowance is (Ali Fakhri).
• Plans don't stack. According to Copes, if you have both a Grok and a Cursor plan, the account uses whichever allowance is larger.

What Grok Bot Is Good At

Superapp's own growth agent works on one narrow job; Grok Bot's strength is breadth. xAI says early teams "created Bots to handle sales outbound, marketing campaigns, office operations, bug fixes, and more" (xAI). Independent testers found the same pattern: it shines at repetitive work spread across many websites and accounts.

Fakhri measured about 25 hours of work across four workflows reduced to about 3, and described it as roughly five times faster, while keeping every publish, send, and payment step under manual approval.

Grok Bot Limitations and Risks

Superapp users building with any agent should read this section carefully, because Grok Bot's limits are mostly about access, not intelligence.

Bots share one computer and its logins. Copes puts it bluntly: "But two Bots are not separate security boundaries." A login you give one Bot for one job can be reachable by another (Flavio Copes). The Rundown's review adds that deleting a Bot does not remove shared files or browser sessions, which must be cleared and access revoked separately (The Rundown).

Approvals gate actions; they do not undo them. Sensitive actions such as sending, publishing, purchasing, and changing permissions need approval, but an "Always Allow" setting can bypass this, and an approval only covers the pending action, not earlier side effects.

You cannot choose the model. Tester Matt Shumer wrote: "You don't choose a model for your Grok Bot" (VentureBeat). Claire Vo agreed: "You can't choose the underlying model, and you can't get into the weeds of its configuration" (ChatPRD).

No published benchmarks. VentureBeat noted that "The company did not release benchmarks for Grok Bot's performance on agentic tasks."

Beta reliability. Fakhri reports that between August 20 and 23, a stuck shared computer disabled all Bots on his account, and that connectors to X and his scheduling tool failed repeatedly.

Limited audit trail. The Rundown notes each Bot keeps only the 20 most recent run records per routine, which "may be insufficient as a compliance audit trail."

Fragile browser work. Copes notes that browser automation breaks when sites change, and that some sites block cloud data-center addresses. His advice: "Do not use an AI computer for every automation."

What Hands-On Reviewers Said

Superapp's team did not run its own long test of Grok Bot for this review, so this table summarizes named reviewers who did, in their own words.

Claire Vo's full verdict is the most balanced summary available: "But if you want a powerful, multi-account agent that's easy to set up, GrokBot is seriously impressive." On multi-account support specifically: "This feature alone would have product-market fit with me." Her one reservation was personality: "It's not a bot I'd want to hang out with." For people who want to tinker with configuration, she points to open-source agents like OpenClaw instead.

More Grok Bot Reviews, in Their Own Words

Jonathan West, Layer3 Labs. West's review focuses on the record-a-task feature: "Its most compelling feature is "teach-a-task."" He is direct about the gaps: "Grok Bot launched in August 2026, so its behavior on messy, real-world workflows is mostly untested outside demos," and notes recorded skills can break when a site's layout changes. His verdict: "Grok Bot is worth it if you already pay for a plan that includes it and you have click-heavy chores to automate" (Layer3 Labs).

Fredrik Falk, Beam AI. Falk, who works for a company selling governed agent platforms, calls it "a genuinely capable product," then argues the enterprise problem is control: "The gaps are not capability gaps." His sharpest line: "There is no enterprise control layer in the box." And on how it spreads: "The newest way an AI agent enters your company is not through procurement" (Beam AI).

Digital Applied. This analysis highlights a mismatch between xAI's marketing and its documentation. The launch page says: "Bots have their own computer." The documentation says: "All of your Bots use the same persistent cloud computer," and warns: "Do not use separate Bots as a security boundary" (Digital Applied). The article also notes that identity, retention, and deletion follow Cursor's terms, so a vendor review should cover Cursor as well as xAI.

Flavio Copes, in more detail. Beyond "Give one Bot one boring job," Copes describes the product's core idea: "Grok Bot instead gives a named AI teammate a persistent computer." His warning on shared setups: "Treat a template like software you did not write."

Grok Bot vs. Claude vs. Codex

Superapp users often already pay for Claude or ChatGPT, so the practical question is whether Grok Bot adds anything. All three can now act on your behalf, but they are built around different ideas.

Grok Bot

A team of persistent, named Bots, each tied to a job, running around the clock on a shared cloud computer, with routines and memory. Its strength is unattended, recurring work across many websites and accounts. Its limits: no model choice, a shared computer that is not a security boundary, and beta reliability.

Claude

Anthropic's Claude works as a general assistant and agent. Claude Code handles agentic coding across a project, and Claude in Chrome, which Anthropic introduced as a research preview in August 2025, lets Claude take actions in your browser with permission. At launch, Anthropic said its defenses cut the success rate of prompt-injection attacks "from 23.6% to 11.2%," that the agent asks permission before high-risk actions such as publishing, purchasing, or sharing personal data, and that financial services and some other site categories are blocked by default (TechCrunch). Paid plans start at 20 USD a month for Pro, with Max from 100 USD (Claude).

OpenAI Codex

Codex is OpenAI's coding agent, and in April 2026 it gained computer use: it can view your screen and click and type in Mac apps, with several agents running at once, plus an in-app browser and a proactive memory mode. OpenAI positioned computer use as most useful for front-end work, app testing, and "workflows without an API." At launch, computer use was Mac-only and not yet available in the EU or UK (Decrypt). Codex is included in ChatGPT Plus at 20 USD a month, with lighter access on Go at 8 USD (OpenAI).

Which should you pick?

Grok Bot vs. Alternatives

Superapp and Selfdrive appear in this table for one use case only, apps; the other rows are general agents. Grok Bot competes most directly with OpenAI's Workspace Agents and with self-hosted agents like OpenClaw. VentureBeat also places it alongside Anthropic's computer use features and OpenAI's computer-control tools.

Grok Bot vs. OpenAI Workspace Agents. OpenAI launched Workspace Agents on April 22, 2026, as cloud agents that can be scheduled, keep memory, and work in team chat channels, for ChatGPT Business, Enterprise, Edu, and Teachers plans (VentureBeat). VentureBeat's line on the category: "The era of the digital coworker has begun." The main difference is where each fits: Workspace Agents work through business integrations inside ChatGPT, while Grok Bot gives each Bot its own computer to operate websites directly, including ones without integrations.

Grok Bot vs. OpenClaw. OpenClaw is free, open-source, and self-hosted, so you control everything, including the model, and you pay only for AI usage. The trade-off is setup and risk: one guide warns that broad computer access "creates a massive blast radius if the system is misconfigured" and recommends running it in an isolated container (Herond). Grok Bot is the opposite choice: easier, but less configurable.

General-Purpose Agents vs. Specialized Workflows: What the Evidence Says

Superapp's Selfdrive is a specialized agent, so we have a stake in this question; that is exactly why the evidence below comes from outside sources. Grok Bot, Claude, and Codex are general-purpose agents: they can attempt almost any task by reasoning about it and operating tools. A specialized workflow does one job through a fixed process with direct access to the data that job needs. The research so far points the same way: for well-defined jobs, specialized beats general.

The people building the models say so. Anthropic, which makes Claude, draws the distinction itself: "Workflows are systems where LLMs and tools are orchestrated through predefined code paths," while agents are "systems where LLMs dynamically direct their own processes and tool usage." Its guidance: "workflows offer predictability and consistency for well-defined tasks," whereas "agents are the better option when flexibility and model-driven decision-making are needed at scale." And the warning: "The autonomous nature of agents means higher costs, and the potential for compounding errors." Its overall advice is "finding the simplest solution possible, and only increasing complexity when needed" (Anthropic: Building effective agents).

Business results favor specialized tools. MIT's NANDA research found that "for 95% of companies in the dataset, generative AI implementation is falling short," but that buying AI tools from specialized vendors and forming partnerships "succeed about 67% of the time," while in-house builds reached about a third of that rate (Fortune).

Analysts expect general agent projects to be cut. Gartner predicts "Over 40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled by the end of 2027," citing "escalating costs, unclear business value or inadequate risk controls." Gartner's Anushree Verma adds: "Many use cases positioned as agentic today don't require agentic implementations" (Gartner).

Benchmarks show general agents struggle with real office work. On TheAgentCompany benchmark from Carnegie Mellon researchers, the best model at the time "was able to autonomously perform 30.3 percent of the provided tests to completion." On Salesforce's CRMArena-Pro, leading agents reached "around 58 percent in single-turn scenarios," falling to "approximately 35 percent in multi-turn settings" (The Register).

The fair counterpoint. General agents are improving fast. On the OSWorld computer-use benchmark, agents passed the human baseline of 72.36% in late 2025. But the same analysis notes that on the harder OSWorld 2.0, a leading model completed 20.6% of long-horizon tasks, and on a benchmark of real paid freelance projects, the best agent completed about 2.5%. As the author puts it: "Those two numbers measure two different things" (Build MVP Fast).

The honest summary: general agents win on breadth, and specialized workflows win on depth. The more a job depends on specific data, rules, and repeatable steps, the more a specialized workflow outperforms a general agent doing the same job through a browser.

Grok Bot vs. Grok Build: Not the Same Product

Superapp users comparing app builders often confuse these two. Grok Build is xAI's coding agent: a terminal tool that launched in beta on May 14, 2026, and, since August 19, 2026, also an app builder inside the Grok chat on web and mobile (Fello AI). Grok Bot is the always-on teammate product for operational work. One builds software; the other operates software.

Grok Bot for App Founders: Building and Growing an App

Superapp is our product, so this is the section to read with the most skepticism. As a disclosure, Superapp and its growth agent, Selfdrive, are our products, so weigh this accordingly.

If your goal is an iPhone app business, Grok Bot can help with general operations around it, such as inbox, research, and social posting. It is not built to create native apps or to run App Store growth. Superapp builds native Swift apps for iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple Watch, and web apps, from a description, compiles them in the cloud, and prepares App Store submissions. Selfdrive is an AI marketing agent for iOS apps: it runs Apple Ads, App Store optimization, creator video campaigns, and a website with SEO content, plans from your App Store Connect analytics, and sends a daily report with items for your approval. Selfdrive is in beta and, like Grok Bot, does not guarantee results.

The fair conclusion: for app founders, these tools are complementary rather than competing. A specialized agent knows the job's rules and data; a general agent like Grok Bot covers everything else.

Marketing an App: Grok Bot, Claude, Codex, or Selfdrive?

Superapp built Selfdrive for this exact job, so we compared the four on the work an app founder actually does each week. The difference is not intelligence. It is what each agent can see, what process it follows, and whether it can measure its own results.

A week of marketing a new iPhone app, two ways

What a general agent would need to match a specialized workflow

A general agent can do every task above in principle. In practice, to match a specialized workflow it would need:

• Ongoing access to App Store Connect analytics and your Apple Ads account, set up and maintained by you.
• Keyword data beyond what it can find on public pages.
• A tested, repeatable process for each channel, so it does not plan from scratch every week.
• Budget rules it cannot exceed and approval points in the right places.
• A way to measure whether each change worked, not just a record of what it did.

Building that harness yourself is possible, and it is exactly the work a specialized tool has already done. This is the pattern the MIT research describes: specialized vendor tools succeed about twice as often as in-house builds.

Where Selfdrive falls short

Selfdrive is narrower by design, and its own pages list the limits. It works with iOS apps only. It is in beta. It does not guarantee a growth timeline: "Keyword research does not guarantee a rank or a number of downloads," and "A bid or an install is not a guarantee of revenue." The App Store optimization workflow does not produce screenshots. Apple Ads does not run in every country. And its pages note that a traditional agency may suit you better for bespoke creative production or brand strategy beyond its four channels (Selfdrive). For anything outside app growth, such as your inbox, research, sales outreach, or admin, a general agent like Grok Bot or Claude is the better tool.

When General-Purpose Agents Win

Superapp's own team would pick a general agent for these jobs, and the evidence supports that too.

This matches Anthropic's own rule: agents are the better choice "when flexibility and model-driven decision-making are needed at scale." The mistake is using a general agent for a well-defined, data-dependent job that a specialized workflow already does better, or the reverse.

A Practical AI Stack for a Solo App Founder

Superapp's users are mostly solo founders, and the most useful answer for them is not "pick one agent." It is to give each job to the tool built for it, and to keep the number of tools small.

Three rules keep a stack like this safe and affordable:

1. One job per agent. Copes' advice for Grok Bot applies to every tool: "Give one Bot one boring job."
2. Specialized where the data matters. If a job depends on specific data, such as App Store analytics or ad results, use a tool that reads that data directly.
3. Approvals on anything that spends money or speaks for you. Every tool in this stack supports approvals; keep them on for spending, publishing, and sending.

What Each Approach Costs

Superapp's prices are fixed; the general agents are bundled into wider subscriptions, so the comparison is approximate. Prices are as listed in October 2026.

The cheapest option is not always the cheapest outcome. A general agent costs less per month, but if you must build and maintain the data access, process, and measurement yourself, your time is part of the price. A specialized tool costs more but arrives with that work done, for one job only.

Questions to Ask Before Choosing Any AI Agent

Superapp asks these questions of its own Selfdrive agent, and they apply equally to Grok Bot, Claude, and Codex.

Is Grok Bot Worth It?

Superapp's answer for its own users is "for operations, maybe; for building and growing an app, use purpose-built tools." For everyone else, it depends on the work.

How to Set Up Grok Bot Safely

Superapp recommends the same caution with any agent that can act for you. These steps combine advice from Copes, Fakhri, and The Rundown's security notes.

1. Start with one narrow job. Copes: "Give one Bot one boring job." A daily report is a better first job than "run my marketing."
2. Begin read-only. Let the Bot read and draft before it can send, post, or buy anything.
3. Enter passwords yourself. Take over the Bot's computer to enter passwords and two-factor codes rather than pasting secrets into prompts.
4. Keep approvals on for consequential actions. Avoid "Always Allow" for sending, publishing, purchases, and permission changes.
5. Separate sensitive accounts. Because Bots share one computer, avoid connecting personal and business accounts you would not want mixed.
6. Check templates before using them. Copes: "Treat a template like software you did not write."
7. Watch usage for the first week. Frequent routines drain the allowance fast.
8. Review after a week. Copes' test: keep a Bot only if you still read its reports after a week.
9. Clean up when you stop. Deleting a Bot does not remove shared files or browser sessions; clear them and revoke access.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Grok Bot?
Grok Bot is xAI's product for AI teammates: persistent AI agents that each have a cloud computer, sign in to your apps and websites, and do recurring work, asking for approval on consequential actions.

When did Grok Bot launch?
xAI launched Grok Bot in early beta on August 11, 2026. Enterprise access opened on September 3, 2026.

How much does Grok Bot cost?
Grok Bot is not sold separately. It is included in xAI and Cursor subscription plans; in October 2026, Cursor's pricing page lists Premium at 30 USD a month with cloud agents and automations. Plan inclusion has changed several times, so check the current pricing page.

Is Grok Bot free?
Not as an ongoing plan. Reviewers report a one-time usage credit for non-subscribers, and enterprise customers received two weeks of free usage at launch.

What can Grok Bot do?
It can browse websites, work with files, run software, and use connected tools to handle jobs like inbox triage, research, outreach, social posting, form submissions, newsletter drafting, and small code tasks.

Is Grok Bot safe to use?
It has approvals for consequential actions, but reviewers flag real limits: all Bots on an account share one computer and its logins, approvals cannot undo completed work, and audit history is short. Start with read-only, narrow jobs.

Can I choose the AI model Grok Bot uses?
No. Reviewers including Matt Shumer and Claire Vo note there is no model picker.

How many Grok Bots can I have?
xAI says it set practical limits of roughly 50 Bots per account and six per group chat.

What devices does Grok Bot work on?
xAI lists desktop apps for macOS, Windows, and Linux, and an iOS app, with Android listed as coming soon at launch. The Bots themselves run in the cloud.

What is the difference between Grok Bot and Grok Build?
Grok Build is xAI's coding agent and in-chat app builder. Grok Bot is the always-on teammate product for operational work across your apps and websites.

Who makes Grok Bot?
xAI, the company behind Grok, which merged with SpaceX in 2026. Grok Bot's computers run in the cloud of Cursor, which SpaceX agreed to acquire.

What are the best Grok Bot alternatives?
OpenAI Workspace Agents for teams on ChatGPT Business or Enterprise, OpenClaw for a self-hosted open-source agent, and specialized agents for specific jobs, such as Selfdrive for growing iOS apps.

Can Grok Bot build an app?
Grok Bot is not an app builder, though it can hand off coding tasks. xAI's Grok Build handles coding, and Superapp builds native Apple apps and web apps from a description.

Can Grok Bot do marketing for my app?
It can help with general marketing tasks like social posting and outreach. For App Store-specific growth, such as Apple Ads and App Store optimization, a specialized agent like Selfdrive works directly with App Store data.

Does Grok Bot work when my computer is off?
Yes. Each Bot runs on a cloud computer and keeps working after you close your laptop.

What are Grok Bot routines?
Routines are scheduled or triggered jobs. xAI describes them as: "The user defines the work once, and the Routine activates the Bot when it needs to happen."

Is Grok Bot good for businesses?
For recurring operations work, reviewers found real time savings. Businesses with strict compliance needs should note the shared-computer security model and limited audit history before relying on it.

Is Grok Bot better than Claude?
They are built for different jobs. Grok Bot is designed for persistent, recurring work on its own cloud computer across many accounts. Claude is a general assistant with agentic coding and permission-based browser actions, and it lets you work with Anthropic's own models.

Is Grok Bot better than OpenAI Codex?
Codex is primarily a coding agent that gained computer use for Mac apps in April 2026. Grok Bot is built for always-on operational work in the cloud. For coding and app testing, Codex is the closer fit; for recurring multi-account browser tasks, Grok Bot is.

What is the best AI agent for marketing an app?
For iOS apps, a specialized agent with App Store data, such as Selfdrive, is the most direct fit because it works from App Store Connect analytics and Apple Ads results. General agents like Grok Bot, Claude, and Codex can help with surrounding tasks like content and outreach.

Do specialized AI tools outperform general AI agents?
For well-defined jobs, the evidence says yes. MIT research found specialized vendor tools succeed about 67% of the time, about twice the rate of in-house builds, and Anthropic advises using predictable workflows for well-defined tasks.

Can Grok Bot run Apple Ads?
It could operate the Apple Ads website through a browser if you give it access, but it has no built-in bidding logic or App Store data. A specialized agent like Selfdrive picks keywords, sets bids within your budget, and pauses weak keywords using your results.

Can Claude or Codex do App Store optimization?
They can draft listing copy and suggest keywords from what you provide. They do not have built-in App Store keyword data or App Store Connect analytics unless you supply them.

Does Selfdrive replace Grok Bot?
No. Selfdrive does one job, growing iOS apps across four channels. Grok Bot, Claude, and Codex handle the many other tasks around a business.

Why do general AI agents fail on real work?
Long, multi-step tasks compound errors. On TheAgentCompany benchmark, the best model completed 30.3% of tasks, and leading agents on Salesforce's CRMArena-Pro dropped from about 58% to about 35% when tasks needed multiple turns.

What is the best AI agent for a solo founder?
Usually more than one, each for a narrow job: a specialized builder and growth agent for the app, such as Superapp and Selfdrive, and a general agent like Grok Bot or Claude for inbox, research, and admin.

Is Grok Bot cheaper than Selfdrive?
Grok Bot is bundled into xAI and Cursor plans, with Premium listed at 30 USD a month, while Selfdrive comes with Superapp Max at 100 USD a month. Selfdrive includes App Store data access, keyword data, and a fixed growth process that you would otherwise build and maintain yourself.

Can I use Grok Bot and Selfdrive together?
Yes. They do different jobs: Selfdrive grows an iOS app through App Store channels, and Grok Bot handles general recurring work like inbox triage and research.

Are AI agents reliable enough for real business work?
For narrow, well-defined, supervised jobs, often yes. For long, multi-step work, benchmarks still show low completion rates, and Gartner expects over 40% of agentic AI projects to be canceled by the end of 2027.

References

• xAI: Introducing Grok Bot

• xAI: Grok Bot product page

• xAI: Designing Grok Bot

• xAI: Grok Bot for Enterprise

• Cursor Docs: Grok Bot

• Cursor: Pricing

• Keywords Everywhere: Grok Bot timeline with sources

• VentureBeat: Grok Bot turns agents into persistent digital coworkers

• ChatPRD, Claire Vo: Hands-on review of GrokBot

• Flavio Copes: A deep dive into Grok Bot

• Ali Fakhri: Grok Bot review, 7 days

• The Rundown: Grok Bot review

• TechZine: SpaceX acquires Cursor

• Fello AI: Grok Build

• VentureBeat: OpenAI unveils Workspace Agents

• Herond: What is OpenClaw

• Anthropic: Building effective agents

• Fortune: MIT report on generative AI pilots

• Gartner: Over 40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled by end of 2027

• The Register: AI agents get office tasks wrong around 70% of the time

• Build MVP Fast: OSWorld and the human baseline

• Layer3 Labs: Grok Bot review

• Beam AI: Grok Bot for enterprise AI agents

• Digital Applied: Grok Bot launch analysis

• TechCrunch: Anthropic launches a Claude AI agent that lives in Chrome

• Decrypt: Codex adds computer use

• Claude: Pricing

• OpenAI: Codex pricing

• Superapp: Selfdrive

• Superapp: Pricing

• Superapp: What is vibe coding